What Role Did The U.S.-Israeli Relationship Play In 9-11?

By Jeff Gates

September 13, 2009 "Information Clearing House" --- On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good. Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)."

Intelligence wars rely on mathematical models to anticipate the response of "the mark" to staged provocations. Reactions thereby become foreseeable-within an acceptable range of probabilities. When Israeli mathematician Robert J. Aumann received the 2005 Nobel Prize in economic science, he conceded that "the entire school of thought that we have developed here in Israel" has turned "Israel into the leading authority in this field."

With a well-planned provocation, the anticipated response can even become a weapon in the arsenal of the agent provocateur. In response to 9-11, how difficult would it be to foresee that the U.S. would deploy its military to avenge that attack? With fixed intelligence, how difficult would it be to redirect that response to wage a long-planned war in Iraq - not for U.S. interests but to advance the agenda for Greater Israel?

The emotionally wrenching component of a provocation plays a key role in the field of game theory war planning where Israel is the authority. With the televised murder of 3,000 Americans, a shared mindset of shock, grief and outrage made it easier for U.S. policy-makers to believe that a known Evil Doer in Iraq was responsible, regardless of the facts.

The strategic displacement of facts with induced beliefs, in turn, requires a period of "preparing the mindset" so that "the mark" will put their faith in a pre-staged fiction. Those who induced the March 2003 invasion of Iraq began "laying mental threads" and creating agenda-advancing mental associations more than a decade earlier.

Notable among those threads was the 1993 publication in Foreign Affairs of an article by Harvard professor Samuel Huntington. By the time his analysis appeared in book-length form in 1996 as The Clash of Civilizations, more than 100 academies and think tanks were prepared to promote it, pre-staging a "clash consensus" five years before 9-11.

Also published in 1996 under the guidance of Richard Perle was A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (i.e., Israel). A member since 1987 of the U.S. Defense Policy Advisory Board, this self-professed Zionist became its chairman in 2001. As a key adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Perle's senior Pentagon post helped lay the required foundation for removing Saddam Hussein as part of a Greater Israel strategy, a key theme of A Clean Break released five years before 9-11.

A mass murder, articles, books, think tanks and Pentagon insiders, however, are not enough to manage the variables in a "probabilistic" war-planning model. Supportive policy makers are also required to lend the appearance of legitimacy and credibility to an operation justified by intelligence fixed around a pre-determined agenda.

That role was eagerly filled by Senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, a Jewish Zionist from Connecticut, and Jon Kyl, a Christian Zionist from Arizona, when they co-sponsored the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. Echoing Tel Aviv's agenda in A Clean Break, their bill laid another mental thread in the public mindset by calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein three years before 9-11.

The legislation also appropriated $97 million, largely to promote that Zionist agenda. Distracted by mid-term Congressional elections and by impeachment proceedings commenced in reaction to a well-timed presidential affair involving White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton signed that agenda into law October 31, 1998 - five years before the U.S.-led invasion that removed Saddam Hussein.

After 9-11, John McCain and Joe Lieberman became inseparable travel companions and irrepressible advocates for the invasion of Iraq. Looking "presidential" aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in January 2002, McCain laid another key thread when he waved an admiral's cap while proclaiming, alongside Lieberman, "On to Baghdad."

By Way of Deception

The chutzpah with which this game theory strategy progressed in plain sight could be seen in the behavior of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, another Zionist insider. Four days after 9-11, in a principals' meeting at Camp David, he proposed that the U.S. invade Iraq. At that time, the intelligence did not yet point to Iraqi involvement and Osama bin Laden was thought to be hiding in a remote region of Afghanistan.

Frustrated that President George H.W. Bush declined to remove Saddam Hussein during the 1991 Gulf War, Wolfowitz proposed a No-Fly Zone in northern Iraq. By 2001, the Israeli Mossad had agents at work for a decade in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. Intelligence reports of Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda also came from Mosul - reports that later proved to be false. Mosul again emerged in November 2004 as a center of the insurgency that destabilized Iraq. That reaction precluded the speedy exit of coalition forces promised in Congressional testimony by senior war-planner Wolfowitz.

The common source of the fixed intelligence that induced America to war in Iraq has yet to be acknowledged even though intelligence experts agree that deception on such a scale required a decade to plan, staff, pre-stage, orchestrate and, to date, cover up. The two leaders of the 9-11 Commission report conceded they were stopped by Commission members from hearing testimony on the motivation for 9-11: the U.S.-Israeli relationship.

The fictions accepted as generally accepted truths included Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague, Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories and Iraqi purchases of "yellowcake" uranium from Niger. Only the last fact was conceded as phony in the relevant time frame. All the rest were disclosed as false, flawed or fixed only after the war began. An attempt to cover-up the yellowcake account led to the federal prosecution of vice-presidential chief of staff Lewis Libby, another well-placed Zionist insider.

Did game theory-modeled pre-staging also include the Israeli provocation that led to the Second Intifada? An intifada is an uprising or, literally, a "shaking off" of an oppressor. The Second Intifada in Palestine dates from September 2000 when Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon led an armed march to Jerusalem's Temple Mount one year before 9-11.

After a year of calm-during which Palestinians believed in the prospects for peace-suicide bombings recommenced after this high-profile provocation. In response to the uprising, Sharon and Netanyahu observed that only when Americans "feel our pain" would they understand the plight of the victimized Israelis. Both Israeli leaders suggested that shared mindset ("feel our pain") would require in the U.S. a weighted body count of 4,500 to 5,000 Americans lost to terrorism, the initial estimate of those who died in the twin towers of New York City's World Trade Center-one year later.

The American Valkyrie?

When successful, game theory warfare strengthens the agent provocateur while leaving the mark discredited and depleted by the anticipated reaction to a well-timed provocation. By game theory standards, 9-11 was a strategic success because the U.S. was portrayed as irrational for its reaction - the invasion of Iraq that triggered a deadly insurgency with devastating consequences both for Iraq and the U.S.

That insurgency, in turn, was an easily modeled reaction to the invasion of a nation that (a) played no role in the provocation, and (b) was known to be populated by three long-warring sects where an unstable peace was maintained by a former U.S. ally who was rebranded an Evil Doer. As the cost in blood and treasure expanded, the U.S. became overextended militarily, financially and diplomatically.

As "the mark" (the U.S.) emerged in the foreground, the agent provocateur faded into the background. But only after catalyzing dynamics that steadily drained the U.S. of credibility, resources and resolve. This "probabilistic" victory also ensured widespread cynicism, insecurity, distrust and disillusionment along with a declining capacity to defend its interests due to the duplicity of a game theory-savvy enemy within.

Meanwhile the American public fell under a regime of oversight, surveillance and intimidation marketed as "homeland" security. This domestic operation even features rhetorical hints of a WWII "fatherland" with clear signs of a force alien to the U.S. with its welcome embrace of open dissent. Is this operation meant to protect Americans or to shield those responsible for this insider operation from Americans?

By manipulating the shared mindset, skilled game theory war-planners can wage battles in plain sight and on multiple fronts with minimal resources. One proven strategy: Pose as an ally of a well-armed nation predisposed to deploy its military in response to a mass murder. In this case, the result destabilized Iraq, creating crises that could be exploited to strategic advantage by expanding the conflict to Iran, another key Israeli goal announced in A Clean Break-seven years before the invasion of Iraq.

Which nation benefitted from the deployment of coalition forces to the region? Today's mathematically model-able outcome undermined U.S. national security by overextending its military, discrediting its leadership, degrading its financial condition and disabling its political will. In game theory terms, these results were "perfectly predictable"-within an acceptable range of probabilities.

In the asymmetry that typifies today's unconventional warfare, those who are few in numbers must wage war by way of deception-non-transparently and with means that leverage their impact. Which nation-if not Israel-fits that description?

Treason in Plain Sight?

Game theory war-planners manipulate the shared mental environment by shaping perceptions and creating impressions that become consensus opinions. With the aid of well-timed crises, policy-makers fall in line with a predetermined agenda-not because they are Evil Doers or "imperialists" but because the shared mindset has been pre-conditioned to respond not to the facts but to manipulated emotions and consensus beliefs. Without the murder of 3,000 on 9-11, America's credibility would not now be damaged and the U.S. economy would be in far better shape.

By steadily displacing facts with what "the mark" can be induced to believe, the few-within-the-few amplify the impact of their duplicity. By steady manipulation of the public's mindset, game theory war-planners can defeat an opponent with vastly superior resources by inducing those decisions that ensure defeat.

Intelligence wars are waged in plain sight and under the cover of widely shared beliefs. By manipulating consensus opinion, such wars can be won from the inside out by inducing a people to freely choose the very forces that imperil their freedom. Thus in the Information Age the disproportionate power wielded by those with outsized influence in media, pop culture, think tanks, academia and politics-domains where Zionist influence is most rampant.

Induced beliefs act as a force-multiplier to wage intelligence wars from the shadows. At the operational core of such warfare are those masterful at anticipating the mark's response to a provocation and incorporating that response into their arsenal. For those who wage war in this fashion, facts are only a barrier to overcome. For those nations dependent on facts, the rule of law and informed consent to protect their freedom, such insider treachery poses the greatest possible threat to national security.

America is far less safe than before 9-11. Tel Aviv clearly intends to continue its serial provocations, as evidenced by its ongoing expansion of the settlements. Israel has shown no sign of a willingness to negotiate in good faith or to take the steps required to make peace a possibility. To date, Barack Obama appears unwilling to name senior appointees who are not either Zionists are strongly pro-Israeli. The greatest threat to world peace is not terrorists. The greatest threat is the U.S.-Israeli relationship.

In the same way that a decade of pre-staging was required to plausibly induce the U.S. to invade Iraq, a similar strategy is now underway to persuade the U.S. to invade Iran or to support and condone an attack by Israel. The same duplicity is again at work, including the high profile branding of the requisite Evil Doer. From its very outset, the Zionist enterprise focused on hegemony in the Middle East. Its entangled alliance with the U.S. enabled this enterprise to deploy American might for that purpose.

Only one nation had the means, motive, opportunity and stable nation state intelligence required to take the U.S. to war in the Middle East while also making it appear that Islam is the problem. If Barack Obama continues to defer to Tel Aviv, he can rightly be blamed when the next attack occurs in the U.S. or the European Union featuring the usual orgy of evidence pointing to a predetermined target. Should another mass murder occur, that event will be traceable directly to the U.S.-Israeli relationship and the failure of U.S policy-makers to free America from this enemy within.

We already knew all along this conspiracy and the agenda behind the invasion and the destruction of the two nations of Iraq and Afghanistan. But to some this may be surprise to them because of their wicked minds that adheres to the neo-Christian Zionist propaganda. Let the truth be told and heard and thanks to Jeff Gates to finally expose the cover-up and that was long to be denied constantly. I will let the readers do the math and be the judges.

Fighting Against Government Armies in the Muslim World

July 14, 2009 - الثلاثاء 23 رجب 1430 by Anwar alAwlaki
Filed under Imam Anwar's Blog

324 Comments

Any army in the world exists with the sole purpose of defending the people from their enemies. But the armies of the Muslim world exist with the sole purpose of defending the interests of the enemies from the Muslims!
This is one of the most ironical situations in our history!
These armies serve two purposes: Defending the King or President along with their associates and secondly, defending the interests of the enemies of the Ummah, the Zionists and Crusaders.
These armies are blocking each and every attempt to re-establish Khalifah and Islamic law. They stand against those who want to establish Islam through Jihad and they even stand in front of those who seek to reach government through peaceful means as what happened in Algeria in the past.
In other words, there can be no Islam with the presence of these armies. The Islamic rule states that whatever is needed to establish an obligation becomes an obligation. Establishing Islamic sharia is an obligation, and fighting in the cause of Allah is an obligation, and if that cannot be achieved except by fighting against these armies then that becomes an obligation.
These armies are the defenders of apostasy in the Muslim world. They fight against Sharia and kill the Muslims who attempt to bring it back. They are fighting on behalf of America against the mujahideen in Pakistan, Somalia and the Maghrib.
If this is the case with these armies how could anyone place the blame on the ones who fight them, accusing them of fighting against Muslims?! What kind of twisted fiqh is this? The blame should be placed on the soldier who is willing to follow orders whether the order is to kill Muslims as in Swat, bomb Masjids as with the Red Masjid, or kill women and children as they do in Somalia, just for the sake of a miser salary. This soldier is a heartless beast, bent on evil, who sells his religion for a few dollars. These armies are the number one enemy of the Ummah. They are the worst of creation. Blessed are those who fight against them and blessed are those shuhada who are killed by them.

The media myth of global Islamic conspiracy...

I saw this article on the internet today and after reading realized it how the human mind can be directed into anything especially when we are not aware the message that are being conveyed to us, but rather nodded our heads and saying right, that's true or it is possible. As we know how today's technology plays a major role for information given in the media to globally and we know who controls them and the purpose behind their agenda. But something are hidden for the bright minds and those who are aware the information they're receiving it. Do you know all along what's being conveyed to you through media and have you ever thought about double checking it whether they are accurate or groundless? And how many of us ever did a little research to ensure the occurrence of what we have been given through the media. As one says a mind is a terrible thing to waste just if we do not use for its purpose that God created for it. Because the myth and the facts come from those who purport to know more than the rest of us. If you haven't already know a war was staged since the revolution of technology especially the media for the average person, in order to corrupt their mind and poured every little possible propaganda that are sellable. Then the average Joe starts to defend the propagandist hidden agenda without ensuring what they are defending.

The media myth of a global Islamic conspiracy never got much traction in America before 2001 because the minority Muslim American population simply did not seem like much of a threat, because Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States are loyal U.S. allies, and because Americans generally have a positive attitude toward wealthy investors.

" Qutb would have prioritised the struggle of Egyptian Muslims to transform Egypt into a virtuous Islamic state, while Azzam argued that every individual Muslim had an obligation to come to the aid of oppressed Muslims everywhere, whether they are Afghan, Kosovar, Bosnian, Thai, Filipino or Chechen " After 9/11 pro-Israel propagandists exploited public ignorance and created a nightmarish fantasy of Al Qaeda in order to put the US and allies into conflict with the entire Islamic world. What is Al Qaeda? What do they believe? What do they actually do? Osama bin Laden first used the term “Al Qaeda” in an interview in 1998, probably in reference to a 1988 article written by Palestinian activist Abdullah Azzam entitled “Al Qa‘ida Al Sulba” (the Solid Foundation). In it, Azzam elaborates upon the ideas of the Egyptian scholar Sayed Qutb to explain modern jihadi principles. Qutb, author of Social Justice in Islam, is viewed as the founder of modern Arab-Islamic political religious thought. Qutb is comparable to John Locke in Western political development. Both Azzam and Qutb were serious men of exceptional integrity and honour. While Qutb was visiting the U.S.A. in 1949, he and several friends were turned away from a movie theater because the owner thought they were black. ‘But we’re Egyptians,’ one of the group explained. The owner apologised and offered to let them in, but Qutb refused, galled by the fact that black Egyptians could be admitted, but black Americans could not,” recounts Lawrence Wright in The Looming Tower. Qutb predicted that the struggle between Islam and materialism would define the modern world. He embraced martyrdom in 1966 in rejection of Arab socialist politics. Azzam similarly rejected secular Palestinian nationalist politics as an impediment to moral virtue. He opposed terrorist attacks on civilians and had strong reservations about ideas like offensive jihad, or preventive war. He also hesitated to designate any Muslim leader as an apostate and preferred to allow God to make such judgments. Inspired by the courage and piety of Afghan Muslims struggling against the Soviets, Azzam reinterpreted Qutb’s concept of individual and collective obligation of Muslims in his fatwa entitled “Defense of the Muslim Lands, the First Obligation after Iman (Faith).” Qutb would have prioritised the struggle of Egyptian Muslims to transform Egypt into a virtuous Islamic state, while Azzam argued that every individual Muslim had an obligation to come to the aid of oppressed Muslims everywhere, whether they are Afghan, Kosovar, Bosnian, Thai, Filipino or Chechen. John Calvert of Creighton University writes, “This ideology… would soon energise the most significant jihad movement of modern times.” At Azzam’s call, Arabs from many countries joined America’s fight against Communism in Afghanistan. No Arab jihadi attack was considered terrorism when Azzam led the group, or later when bin Laden ran the group. Because the global Islamic movement overlapped with the goals of the U.S. government, Arab jihadis worked and traveled friction-lessly throughout the world between Asia, Arabia and America. Azzam was assassinated in Pakistan in 1989, but legends of the courageous sacrifices of the noble Arab Afghans energised the whole Islamic world.

" Al Qaeda has never been and certainly is not today an immensely powerful terror organisation controlling Islamic banks and charities throughout the world " After the Soviets left Afghanistan, bin Laden relocated to Sudan in 1992. At the time he was probably undisputed commander of nothing more than a small group, which became even smaller after he lost practically all his money on Sudan investments. He returned to Afghanistan in 1996, where the younger Afghans, the Taliban welcomed him on account of his reputation as a veteran war hero. There is no real evidence that bin Laden or Al Qaeda had any connection to the Ugandan and Tanzanian embassy attacks or any of the numerous attacks for which they have been blamed. Pro-Israel propagandists like Daniel Pipes or Matthew Levitt needed an enemy for their war against Muslim influence on American culture more than random explosions in various places needed a central commander. By the time the World Trade Center was destroyed, the Arab fighters surrounding Osama bin Laden were just a dwindling remnant living on past glories of Afghanistan’s struggle against Communism. Al Qaeda has never been and certainly is not today an immensely powerful terror organisation controlling Islamic banks and charities throughout the world. Al Qaeda maintained training camps in Afghanistan like Camp Faruq, where Muslims could receive basic training just as American Jews go to Israel for military training with the IDF. There they learned to disassemble, clean and reassemble weapons, and got to associate with old warriors, who engaged in great heroism against the Soviets, but did not do much since. Many Al Qaeda trainees went on to serve U.S. interests in Central Asia (e.g. Xinjiang) in the 1990s, but from recent descriptions the camps seem to currently provide a form of adventure tourism with no future enlistment obligations. Although Western media treats Al Qaeda as synonymous with Absolute Evil, much of the world reveres the Arab Afghans as martyr saints. Hundreds of pilgrims visit Kandahar’s Arab cemetery daily, believing that the graves of those massacred in the 2001 U.S. bombing of Afghanistan possess miraculous healing powers.

too long...

It has been too long since I have updated my page. I recently came back a trip to visit the holy places Makkah and Madinah for Umrah. It was very pleasant and I had the utmost pleasure while I was in there. Although the temperature was very hot and dry but I enjoyed every bit of it and cannot wait to return it. Make a supplication that may Allah accept mu Umrah and all my supplications...

DID YOU KNOW?

• Did you know that non-Jewish Israelis cannot buy or lease land in the Zionist entity?


• Did you know that Palestinian license plates in Zionist entity are color coded to distinguish jews from non-jews?
• Did you know that Israel allots 85% of the water resources for jews and the remaining 15% is divided among all Palestinians in the territories? For example in Hebron, 85% of the water is given to about 400 settlers, while 15% must be divided among Hebron's 120,000 Palestinians?


• Did you know the United States awards the Israel $5 billion in aid each year?


• Did you know that yearly US aid to Israel exceeds the aid the US grants to the whole African continent?


• Did you know that the Israel is the only country in the Middle East that has nuclear weapons?


• Did you know that the Israel is the only country in the Middle East that refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections from its sites?


• Did you know that Israel currently occupies territories of two sovereign nations (Lebanon and Syria) in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions?


• Did you know that Israel has for decades routinely sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies?


• Did you know that high-ranking military officers in the Israeli Defense Forces have admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed by the IDF?


• Did you know that Israel refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?


• Did you know that Israel routinely confiscates bank accounts, businesses, and land and refuses to pay compensation to those who suffer the confiscation?


• Did you know that Israel blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship in international waters, killing 33 and wounding 177 American sailors?


• Did you know that the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders, is the Jewish AIPAC?



• Did you know that Israel stands in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council Resolutions?



• Did you know that today's Israel sits on the former sites of more than 400 now-vanished Palestinian villages, and that the Israeli's re- named almost every physical site in the country to cover up the traces?


• Did you know that it was not until 1988 that Israelis were barred from running "Jews Only" job ads?


• Did you know that four prime ministers of Israel (Begin, Shamir, Rabin, and Sharon) have taken part in either bomb attacks on civilians, massacres of civilians, or forced expulsions of civilians from their villages?


• Did you know that the Israeli Foreign Ministry pays two American public relations firms to promote Israel to Americans?


• Did you know that Sharon's coalition government includes a party -- Molodet -- which advocates expelling all Palestinians from the occupied territories?


• Did you know that Israel's settlement-building increased in the eight years since Oslo?


• Did you know that settlement building under Barak doubled compared to settlement building under Netanyahu?


• Did you know that Israel once dedicated a postage stamp to a man who attacked a civilian bus and killed several people?


• Did you know that recently-declassified documents indicate that David Ben-Gurion in at least some instances approved of the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948?


• Did you know that despite a ban on torture by Israel's High Court of Justice, torture has continued by Shin Bet interrogators on Palestinian prisoners?


• Did you know that Palestinian refugees make up the largest portion of the refugee population in the world?


• And finally do you know who is the terrorist now ?

PS. Do you know that the Zionist and its sympathizers are reading this and saying, darn this is
true but we are still getting away while the rest pays our propaganda...

helplessly me...

As I helplessly sit my couch and gaze my television set and sometimes browse from site to site reading and witnessing the massacre of children, women, old, young, innocent and by standers, i become powerless, angry, frustrated, confused and cry for these victims. All these gulf Arab governments are watching the genocide and not even standing up to the Zionist regime or doing any humanitarian to help those who homes shattered and their family are massacred. the Arab states remained silent and shamefully watching this unfolded genocide. Egypt which was the right hand of the Zionist regime went far and closed its borders for the fleeing refugees. Other states are having a high class summit and discussing how to flourish their wealth rather than their next door brothers' situation and how to confront the Zionist regime. And the western nations also watching it carefully while they still supplying the missiles and jets the regime.
As each one of us will be held accountable for what we contributed or not by the day we stand in front of Allah. Those of us who are in power but chose to remain silent, there is a day that they have to answer and those who were oppressed, killed and victimized will be awarded in the highest. In God's will, everyone who were victim for this barbaric massacre will be granted in paradise. i am helpless and all i can do is to make supplications and cry alone for these innocent victims and condemn the Zionist regime's merciless massacre.

A change... uhh!!!

I want to touch a little bit about the election that took place on November 4, 2008 in U.S. People came out overwhelmingly to vote as how they saw a change directions in the U.S policy or overall Washington maniac policy. Many others voted for different reasons but whatever the case was it happened and history was made according to many. Others indicated that this is a new era not only for the American politics but foreign policy, policy within American and its race relations, or as others argued that the American dream is on the rise again, or as far as one news contributor put it that after all, all men are created equal. These are the voices, thoughts and opinions that dominated the news media for the last two weeks around the world. Everyone has their opinion and perceptions how this new administration will be different than the dictatorship we had for the last eight years. But then one has to look deep within the American politics and policy towards its own and the world, and then decide the outcome of this new administration. I am not denying that Obama ran one the best campaign in U.S to overcome doubts in order to beat the best and maintain the highest office. This is a man who started his career on the south side of Chicago as community organizer then represented state of Illinois for the senate and before his term ended, occupied the highest seat and made all these campaign promises of changes in each directions; economy, health care, war on terrorism, education, gitmo prison, and foreign policy 'for the better of one region.' His campaign slogans were screaming change directions in Washington and his charmed speeches attracted millions in nation wide. I am curious how his change of policy will change and be different than the one before since all Washington's adhere to the same policy. Are we all fooled for these kind of promises that are made over and over in every election and its outcome becomes non-existence. Are we fall into entrapment for these politicians? or Are we all misguided the slogans of change or it is something that we all know that it will change Washington for the better after all?
As one blogger wrote this paragraph in online article he stated, "For me, it is wrong to support a guy who has very strong opinions about making Jerusalem the undivided capital of the Zionist entity at the expense of the downtrodden Palestinians. It is wrong to support a guy who has picked Joe Biden as Vice President, a staunch supporter of the Zionist Regime and the architect behind the proposal of dividing Iraq into three enclaves. It is wrong to support a guy who has picked Rohm Emmanuel as his Chief of Staff, another staunch supporter of the Zionist Regime and who fought alongside the Israelis army in Palestine. It is wrong to support a man who has renounced his Islamic roots and denies his name just to win an election." It is unbelievable step to take while you preaching that you want to be different than the tenant before you. Picking up the most hardliners and regime supporters in a Washington change-policy. Not to mention that Obama gave speech the most powerful lobbyist group AIPAC "known before Zionist" that he will stand beside Israel for right and wrong and make its interest priority, which definitely makes Israel a state within U.S. I am also sure that he made other promises to others in order to be voted for him. How do you support a regime that occupied an innocent people's land, a one that terrorizes women and children, a one that does a daily air strikes and invasion in tows and villages and one that oppresses others, a regime that's shielded for any shame or wrong doing, what a contradiction change of policy. There are many regimes that do not recognize freedom of any kind and its intellectuals, scholars and politicians are prison janitors. How about a regime that sells its own citizen for the better of gaining money and reputation for a falling empire. How about a policy that does not condemn torture, water boarding, kidnapping, long imprisonment and excessive violent integration. So whoever will benefit the outcome of these promises won the election, which are the AIPAC lobbyist. This is how the plutocracy American government works regards to Israel's policy. The powerful Zionist lobbyist are only interesting its regime. AIPAC is a rich and influential group that declares America must continue to stand by Israel`s side politically, diplomatically and economically. AIPAC trains and educates pro-Israel students across America and develops their leadership skills so that they become effective citizen lobbyists today, and pro-Israel leaders tomorrow.
They often lobby to make the U.S government to give money to its regime, make America fight the regime's wars, and make America protect Israel's regime in the U.N. They work the president and the congress and fortunately they are effective and successful. "Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that...I want to tell you something very clear: Do not worry American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." quoted by Israel's prime minister Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres on October 3, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. Since it is not publicly illegal yet in America to pronounce the truth, I will conclude that American politicians are the Zionist regime's puppets. And the rest, you be the judge...